Bunnie Xo, the spouse of musician Jelly Roll, has openly discussed the severe side effects she's endured from microdosing a weight-loss medication on her podcast, Dumb Blonde, Daily Mail reported.
Bunnie Xo has been seeking methods to manage her weight, which led her to try the pharmaceutical option, tripeptide, known for aiding weight loss. However, her experience was far from typical, beginning her regimen with trepidation due to potential side effects.
Following the initiation of her treatment, Xo reported feeling unusually hungry, a side effect contrary to the appetite-suppressing qualities the drug purportedly offers. "I'm on my second day of tripeptide and I'm feeling as hungry as anything," she mentioned in a candid admission during her podcast. Despite hoping for a decrease in appetite, her hunger levels increased, presenting an unexpected challenge in her weight-loss journey.
Adding to her distress, Xo experienced severe gastrointestinal symptoms, including significant discomfort that led her to express it in vivid terms on her show. "I ‘relieved myself’ extensively," she explained, indicating the gravity of her response to the medication. Her ordeal did not stop at digestive issues; she also faced nausea severe enough to nearly lead to vomiting.
Seeking some form of relief, Xo found a temporary solution by consuming watermelon, which helped mitigate some of her stomach troubles. Despite her efforts and the drastic experiences, the results were minimal. "I woke up a pound and a half lighter. So we'll see how it goes," she discovered, an outcome that hardly seemed worth the severe reactions she endured.
Her conversation about these health trials extended beyond weight issues. In fact, Xo shared that she recently faced a health scare involving what she thought was an aneurysm in her carotid artery, which terrified her. Thankfully, further medical consultations clarified that it was likely just an imaging artifact, thereby alleviating some of her concerns but still leaving an emotional impact.
Amid these health challenges, Bunnie Xo and her husband, Jason Bradley DeFord, known professionally as Jelly Roll, are embarking on another significant journey. The couple, having been married for six years, are planning to start a family through in vitro fertilization (IVF).
They chose to make this private aspect of their lives public. "We had planned on doing this privately, but decided our IVF journey needed to be shared because we've always been so open," said Xo, touching on their transparent approach to personal struggles.
Jelly Roll, already a father to two children from previous relationships, and Xo feel both excited and nervous about the process, which they confess has been challenging from the start.
Nevertheless, they maintain high hopes for a child together, offering a new chapter in their already complex narrative that includes managing health issues, family life, and public careers.
Furthermore, their narrative unfolds under the public eye, as fans rally around their favorite artist and his spouse while they handle serious health concerns, weight management, and the prospects of expanding their family.
Ultimately, Jelly Roll and Bunnie Xo's journey embodies their determination and openness, which play crucial roles in navigating their many life transitions.
Fear and curiosity drove an Ohio woman to suspect a grim discovery hidden beneath her backyard, ultimately sparking a police investigation that captivated millions online. Katie Santry from Columbus gained viral attention after she shared videos on TikTok about unearthing an oddly placed rug, raising fears that it might conceal something far more sinister than dirt.
Columbus Police exhaustively searched the area but concluded that no human or animal remains lay beneath the rug, Fox News reported.
Katie Santry posted her initial video earlier in the week, showing her and her family digging up the suspicious rug. This singular act of curiosity quickly transformed from a simple landscaping project into online viral content. Santry's TikTok videos rapidly amassed millions of views, leading viewers to speculate and suggest she contact the police.
Following the swell of public concern amplified by social media, the Columbus Police felt compelled to investigate. They arrived at Santry’s residence and began a formal investigation. Initial skepticism from dispatch officers shifted as more details about the situation emerged.
The police ultimately decided to bring in specialized units to ensure a thorough investigation. Homicide detectives and forensic experts joined the effort, along with cadaver dogs trained to detect human remains through scent.
Despite the public fears fueled by the videos and the intriguing reactions of cadaver dogs on-site, investigators found no evidence of a crime. Two different cadaver dogs reacted positively during their inspection, prompting police forensic teams to conduct a more detailed excavation. The heightened response indicated the potential severity of what might have been buried beneath the seemingly innocuous rug.
As the investigation intensified, officials collected samples of the rug and surrounding soil to analyze for traces of human and animal remains. However, the tests returned negative results, ruling out the initial fears of a buried body. The forensic analysis revealed no blood residue or decomposed material linked to any criminal activity.
Columbus Police subsequently wrapped up the investigation by Friday afternoon, confirming that the scene posed no threat to public safety. They also clarified that homeowners often bury old items during landscaping or construction activities to avoid the hassle of proper disposal.
Police provided insights into why the cadaver dogs might have reacted despite the absence of evidence for remains. Officers explained that these specially trained dogs could alert to residual scents not linked to criminal evidence, such as those from historical injuries sustained by previous property owners or animals.
Diligent officers led the investigation, using technology and trained animals, ultimately providing peace of mind to the community and to Katie Santry herself. Despite the intense scrutiny and initial concern, the matter resolved with professionalism and thorough investigative work.
Katie Santry described the entire ordeal as "the most absurd, insane experience of my life," noting the bizarre nature of such widespread public speculation stemming from one backyard discovery. She expressed bewilderment at her sudden thrust into the spotlight, precipitated by her viral videos and the eerie implications of her find.
"The entire world was telling me to have the police come," Santry remarked on the wave of public response that pressured her to escalate the situation. She recalled feeling overwhelmed by the situation, something as simple as calling the police to investigate a rug made her question her rationale.
Community interest in the event showcased the power of social media to amplify personal incidents into broadly engaging narratives. This incident serves as a reminder of the role the internet plays in shaping public perceptions and actions, intertwining local oddities with global audiences.
The police assured the public that no further investigations would be conducted at the property, citing the comprehensive nature of their findings. Their detailed assessment confirmed that the buried rug was nothing more than an unusual choice in waste management by previous property owners or constructors.
With the investigation concluded, and the mystery resolved, Katie Santry and her family can now return to their daily lives, albeit now significantly more noted by their online community. The bizarre event, while distressing, also highlighted the cohesive interaction between law enforcement and community engagement in the digital age.
Anchorage, Alaska — A chilling analysis of serial killings across the United States has positioned Alaska at the top, revealing a concerning insight into regional patterns of such crimes.
A recent CrimeCapsule.com study based on FBI data has pinpointed the seven U.S. states where serial murders are most prevalent per capita, notably led by Alaska, Daily Mail reported.
The criteria defining a serial killer involves committing multiple murders, typically driven by psychological motives and occurring within a short period. This definition underpins the new report which lists these perpetrators and examines potential causes for their actions.
Alaska, a state characterized by vast wilderness and long, dark winters, leads with a serial murder rate of about 15 per million residents. The study spans murders recorded from 1900 to 2014, peaking during the 1980s. Robert Hansen, one of Alaska’s most infamous serial killers, highlights the severity and stealth of these crimes; he was convicted of killing at least 17 women and raping 30 between the 1970s and 1980s.
Experts suggest that environmental factors like the elongated winter nights might affect mental and emotional states, potentially influencing the high incidence of serial killings in the region. This geographic-psychological link attempts to explain why some areas might be more prone to such violent outbreaks than others.
Following Alaska in the grim ranking is Nevada, with about 12 serial murders per million people. Nevada’s victim profile often includes tourists, which reflects the transient nature of the state’s population. The case of Rodney Halbower, the 'Gypsy Hill Killer', underscores the enduring mystery and challenges faced by law enforcement across decades. Halbower was convicted of crimes that date back over 40 years.
Florida ranks similarly troubling with its history of 778 murders, with many cases like that of Aileen Wuornos gaining notoriety. Wuornos herself stated that her motives were rooted in a deep loathing for men and the necessity to rob, showcasing the complex personal motives behind such heinous acts.
The serial killing landscape is vast. California recorded a significant number of serial murders, a fifth of the nation’s total during the 1980s. High-profile killers such as Edmund Kemper and the Manson Family members have been part of this dark history. Kemper's own words chillingly reflect the dual nature of his thoughts towards potential victims.
In the north, Washington state has been home to infamous killers like Ted Bundy and Gary Ridgway. Ridgway, known as the 'Green River Killer', once gruesomely admitted to targeting prostitutes because he believed they would not be missed, highlighting the cruel calculus of such killers.
Oregon and Louisiana also feature prominently on this list. Oregon’s rate is 7.36 per million residents, with incidents often linked to Randall Woodfield, the so-called I-5 Killer, suspected of numerous murders along Interstate 5. In contrast, Louisiana’s historical backdrop includes killers like Clementine Barnabet, who committed voodoo-associated murders, reflecting a blend of cultural and psychological elements in the motives of serial killers.
This comprehensive study does more than enumerate killings; it dives into the factors that might contribute to such phenomena. By looking at aspects like local transient populations and environmental influences, the study aims to provide a broader understanding of the contexts that nurture these crimes.
As unsettling as these findings are, they serve a crucial social function. Awareness and understanding of the patterns in serial murders can help in forming better protective measures and law enforcement strategies aimed at preventing future atrocities. This study acts not only as a record of past horrors but also as a potential guide for safeguarding society's future.
The beluga whale, known as Hvaldimir and once suspected to be a Russian spy, died from a bacterial infection, Norwegian authorities confirmed, CBS News reported.
Hvaldimir, the beluga who captured global attention in 2019 after being discovered with a harness labeled "Equipment St. Petersburg," has been a subject of international intrigue and speculation. Initially believed to be part of Russian military operations due to the harness markings, the whale's origin and purpose sparked debates and concerns regarding marine animals used in espionage.
The mystery surrounding Hvaldimir began when fishermen near the Arctic town of Hammerfest, Norway, spotted him exhibiting unusually friendly behavior. The harness, suggesting a connection to human handlers, fueled stories and theories about his past, linking him to possible naval activities originating from nearby Russian waters.
This narrative took a turn when authorities found Hvaldimir dead last month on August 31 in a bay in southern Norway, presenting signs of physical trauma. Initially, animal rights advocates, including organizations like OneWhale and NOAH, posited that malicious foul play could have led to his death. They speculated that someone shot him, as one injury appeared similar to a bullet hole.
However, the Norwegian police, along with the Veterinary Institute, conducted a thorough forensic examination that included x-rays of Hvaldimir's remains. These investigations ruled out the presence of any projectiles or metal fragments within the body. Contrary to initial suspicions, the injuries did not match gunshot wounds, shifting the focus away from the theory that someone intentionally harmed Hvaldimir.
Amund Preede Revheim, head of the North Sea and Environment section, shared key insights from the autopsy results, indicating a natural yet unfortunate cause of death. "It concludes that the probable cause of death was a bacterial infection—possibly as a result of a wound in the mouth from a stuck stick," Revheim explained. He noted that the condition of the whale's body complicated the autopsy process: "Many of the whale's organs were very rotten," which posed challenges during the examination.
The lodged stick in Hvaldimir's mouth, which caused the fatal bacterial infection, highlighted the environmental dangers that marine animals face. This shift in focus transformed public discourse from espionage to wildlife safety and marine health.
Hvaldimir's story has illuminated broader issues of marine welfare and human impacts on wildlife, despite the circumstances of his death. OneWhale, an advocacy group that closely followed his journey since his discovery, highlighted their role and the public's engagement with Hvaldimir's saga. "How Hvaldimir died doesn't impact the work OneWhale did to protect him and advocate for him over the last 5 years," a representative from OneWhale stated.
The group also proudly brought attention to the challenges marine creatures like Hvaldimir face, underscoring the broader implications of their advocacy efforts, regardless of the specifics of his death. These statements emphasize the ongoing need for awareness and protective measures for marine life, which often gets caught in the crosshairs of human activity.
In conclusion, Hvaldimir's tale, while ending on a somber note, has sparked critical conversations about marine life conservation, the intersections of human and wildlife domains, and the mysterious, intertwined narratives of geopolitics and animal behavior. His story remains a poignant reminder of the complexities in our interactions with nature and the mysteries that continue to pervade the depths of the oceans.
The National Archives will release a series of records about Hunter Biden and other Biden family members on November 6, following the presidential election.
A delay in releasing documents linked to the Biden family has sparked discussions amidst legal and political realms, New York Post reported.
In September 2022, America First Legal (AFL) initiated a lawsuit targeting the National Archives and Records Administration demanding access to correspondence and records tied to Joe Biden when he served as Vice President, as well as his brother James, and son Hunter. This set off a chain of procedural and legal activities centered around these potentially revealing documents.
Originally, these records were scheduled to be made public on September 23, 2024. However, following a request from President Biden's legal team, the Department of Justice confirmed an extension pushing the release date to November 6, just after the election.
The Presidential Records Act of 1978 is critical in this context as it mandates that all documentary materials related to the presidential office be preserved. This act has ensured that the records involving the Biden family, encapsulating various forms of correspondence and financial documents, are maintained securely by the National Archives.
Among the delayed batch are records including material about James Biden's interactions, details from a defunct firm co-founded by Hunter Biden named Rosemont Seneca, and documents associated with Hunter Biden’s financial activities. These materials are significant due to their implications and the insights they may provide into the dealings of the Biden family during Joe Biden’s vice presidency.
Moreover, the records include photographs from a White House event that James Biden attended, along with tax form preparations for the year 2015. The year 2015 is particularly notable since Hunter Biden engaged in financial transactions with Burisma Holdings in Ukraine and received loans connected to Romanian businessman Gabriel Popoviciu.
The push to extend the document release date came under scrutiny by AFL, especially considering the timing post-election. AFL's Vice President, Dan Epstein, criticized the delay, stating that the National Archives "arbitrarily deferred to former President Obama and current President Biden’s requests to delay disclosure of likely embarrassing records until after the election."
In response to these claims, a representative from the National Archives clarified their role saying, “NARA does not grant or approve the extension and cannot deny it.” This stance by NARA underscores their procedural obligation and the limitations within which they operate, disavowing responsibility for the timing of the release.
AFL's investigations have also uncovered that Joe Biden used multiple pseudonyms in email communications during his tenure as Vice President. These discoveries have broadened the scope of the information they seek, which includes over a thousand emails between Biden’s office and Rosemont Seneca, the firm co-founded by Hunter Biden.
These revelations emerge while Hunter Biden faces legal challenges of his own. He recently pleaded guilty to charges of tax evasion and received a guilty verdict in separate felony gun charges. Amidst these controversies, President Biden has explicitly stated that he will not pardon his son.
The intertwining of legal, political, and personal elements in this story highlights the broader implications of the document release delay. The documents' ultimate revelations could significantly impact public perceptions and the Biden administration’s historical record.
As the date approaches for the eventual release of these records, everyone will focus on how this information might influence public opinion and shape the historical understanding of the Biden administration's inner workings. The aftermath of this delayed release is yet to unfold, but it surely stands as a significant episode in contemporary political history.
While AFL's relentless pursuit and the ensuing legal skirmishes reflect the contentious nature of presidential record handling, the broader democratic implications of transparency and historical accuracy remain central themes in this ongoing saga.
In a decisive legal ruling, Edwin Castro, a 31-year-old billionaire from the recent Powerball draw, retains his $2 billion fortune following a dismissed lawsuit. The suit alleged that he wrongly possessed the winning ticket.
Los Angeles County Judge dismisses lawsuit over $2 billion jackpot ticket, affirming Edwin Castro as legitimate winner, Daily Mail reported.
Last November, Edwin Castro hit the jackpot, winning a staggering $2 billion in the Powerball lottery. His stroke of luck positioned him as one of the wealthiest lottery winners in history. Castro chose a lump sum payout, receiving approximately $997 million after taxes, a decision that transformed him into a billionaire.
However, the massive windfall quickly became a legal battleground. Jose Rivera, aged 43, claimed that the $2 billion ticket belonged to him. He accused Castro of stealing the ticket, an accusation that led to intense scrutiny and a lawsuit attempting to claim the fortune.
Rivera's claim was brought before a Los Angeles County court, but he faced a significant setback due to a lack of physical evidence. Rivera was unable to present the ticket in question, a crucial piece of evidence that significantly weakened his position. The court highlighted the importance of possessing the ticket, and adhering to lottery rules that clearly define the ticket holder as the presumptive winner.
The rule's stipulations were made clear by the court, "Players are solely responsible for securing their Tickets against theft, loss, damage, or destruction," a direct citation from the judge's documents. This ruling underscored a fundamental lottery principle: possession is paramount.
The case concluded on September 30, when the judge dismissed Rivera's lawsuit due to his inability to produce the physical ticket, thereby affirming Castro as the rightful winner. Furthermore, Rivera's circumstances worsened as he was later charged by authorities for filing a false police report regarding the alleged theft, a serious offense that undermined his credibility.
Following Rivera's accusations, an investigation was conducted by both the Pasadena Police Department and California Lottery investigators. The investigation revealed inconsistencies in Rivera's story, leading to charges against him. This added a layer of drama to the narrative, complicating Rivera's already precarious legal standing.
Amidst the controversy, Edwin Castro went about the business of managing his fortune. He began investing in luxury real estate, purchasing high-end sports cars, and embarking on trips to exotic locations—typical expenditures for someone who had just come into a billion-dollar fortune. Further complicating the matter, Castro's former landlord, Urachi F. Romero, brought forward an additional testimony. Romero claimed to have seen Rivera in possession of the winning ticket and also suffered threats from Rivera, who was desperate to support his claim to the ticket.
With the legal hurdles largely behind him, Castro has focused on wealth management. He enlisted his brother Jesse, a professional banker, to manage the financial complexities that come with such a sizable fortune. Together, they navigate the responsibilities and opportunities of substantial wealth.
Terry Fahn of Strick and Company handles media representation for Castro, and he has pointedly not commented on the dismissal beyond acknowledging its receipt. The avoidance of the media spotlight serves as a strategic move to mitigate public scrutiny and maintain privacy in matters that have already drawn ample public and legal attention.
The outcome of this high-stakes legal drama not only reaffirms the inviolable rules of lottery engagement but also underscores the vital importance of legal possession in disputes of this magnitude. For Edwin Castro, the future now holds promise without the cloud of legal ambiguity, even as his lifestyle adjusts to the realities of his newfound wealth.
Reflecting on the court’s decision, the broader impact of this case touches on the integrity of lottery systems and safeguards against fraudulent claims. It highlights the necessity for rigorous scrutiny and protects rightful winners against undue claims that might otherwise jeopardize their right to what is legally theirs. Edwin Castro’s life has irreversibly changed, marked by both his monumental win and the significant legal victory that affirmed it. The tale of Edwin Castro’s lottery win and the subsequent legal battle serves as a compelling narrative about fortune, truth, and the pursuit of justice, encapsulating the drama of immense wealth and the complexities it attracts.
Page Six reported that a film crew captured Daniel Day-Lewis on a set in Manchester, marking a potential return to acting despite his retirement in 2017.
Meanwhile, onlookers witnessed Oscar-winning actor Daniel Day-Lewis unexpectedly return to a movie set this past Sunday as the streets of Manchester, England, buzzed with excitement.
The acclaimed actor, known for his immersive and intense method acting techniques, previously announced his retirement after completing the 2017 film "Phantom Thread."
In addition, Day-Lewis, dressed in an olive green bomber jacket paired with black pants, brown boots, and black gloves, maneuvered a motorbike while co-star Sean Bean clung on behind him, playing an ex-soldier in the movie.
Both actors donned white safety helmets, which, along with Day-Lewis's gold eyeglasses and well-trimmed gray beard, painted a vivid picture of what appeared to be a thrilling scene from the new film titled "Avelyn."
Reports suggest that "Avelyn" is set in the 1980s; however, specific details about Day-Lewis’s character remain scarce. Meanwhile, fans and film enthusiasts sparked rumors and excitement when they spotted Day-Lewis on the movie set, speculating about the nature of his role and his potential comeback to the silver screen.
Furthermore, Day-Lewis, whose last notable appearance was in "Phantom Thread," directed by Paul Thomas Anderson, previously stated that he experienced profound sadness during and after the film's completion, which ultimately led to his retirement. He openly shared that this deep emotional state significantly influenced his decision to step away from acting.
Curiously, Day-Lewis’s IMDb profile did not list "Avelyn" at the time of his sighting. Consequently, this omission has sparked further intrigue and raised questions about whether he planned his participation in the film or if it marks a spontaneous return to his acting career.
Given that "Phantom Thread" was supposed to be his last film, his current involvement with "Avelyn" comes as both surprising and significant.
Moreover, to add to the mystery, Day-Lewis's representatives have not responded to inquiries regarding his return, and he has not issued any official statement about his involvement in the new movie. As a result, this silence has only fueled the public's curiosity and enthusiasm for more information.
Reflecting on his decision to retire, Day-Lewis mentioned in interviews that he didn’t realize he would stop acting until it became a reality. In addition, he recounted his emotional journey during "Phantom Thread," saying, "I do know that Paul and I laughed."
In a remarkable display of historical literacy and cultural preservation, Washington D.C.'s Museum of the Bible now hosts the world’s oldest Jewish book, the Afghan Liturgical Quire (ALQ).
According to Fox News, the new "Sacred Words: Revealing the Earliest Hebrew Book" exhibit has been timed perfectly with the onset of Rosh Hashanah, featuring profound artifacts from Jewish heritage.
The Museum of the Bible, established in 2017, has welcomed over three million visitors since its opening. The museum aims to empower a broader understanding and deeper appreciation of the Bible's influence across various spheres. Integrating a blend of historical, artistic, and religious insights, the museum continually attracts a diverse audience.
The exhibit titled "Sacred Words: Revealing the Earliest Hebrew Book" capitalizes on the cultural and historical significance of the ALQ—determined to be from the 700s and preserved through the centuries. This ancient text features pages delicately lined with prayers, poems, and intricate drawings from the Hebrew Bible, encapsulating the profound nuances of an era long gone.
Carlos Campo, CEO of the Museum of the Bible, articulated the exhibit’s unique allure, emphasizing its coinciding with the High Holy Days. He remarked, "When you combine the cultural significance and the religious significance and then release it during the High Holy Days, it’s a powerful testament to the commitment of the Jewish people."
The ALQ profoundly connects to the Bamiyan Valley of Afghanistan, once a thriving hub of Buddhism along the Silk Roads. This geographical and cultural interconnection highlights the complex networks of religious and historical exchanges across Asia. The press release from the museum highlighted how Christians, Jews, and Muslims collectively contributed to the preservation and understanding of this vital manuscript.
The exhibit further illustrates how the ALQ incorporates pages from what researchers know to be the oldest discovered Passover Haggadah, a pivotal text in Jewish religious traditions. Scholars have praised the ALQ for its impeccable preservation and the detailed insight it provides into early Jewish liturgical practices.
Campo also shed light on the architectural magnificence of the Museum of the Bible itself. He contends that the structure is a feast for the eyes and the soul—a place where the physical grandeur of the building meets the spiritual grandeur of the Bible's teachings. "They walk in the museum and they see the grand hall and it’s a 150-foot-long space that is more than a story high. It immediately gives you a sense of wonder," Campo described.
The CEO further elaborated on the profound impact of the scripture as it bridges humanity with the divine, reflecting, "It gives you a sense of wonder as it ties humanity to God."
The Sacred Words exhibit will remain open until January 12, 2025, providing visitors with an extensive window to explore this rare artifact. The collaboration across different faiths to bring this exhibit to fruition underscores universal respect for sacred texts and shared human heritage.
As the Museum of the Bible continues to draw visitors with its dynamic displays and engaging exhibits, the unveiling of the ALQ represents not just a testament to Jewish survival and faith but also to the enduring power of sacred words that once echoed through the corridors of time.
In an unexpected move, Hollywood actor Zachary Levi endorsed Donald Trump during a political event this past Saturday.
Zachary Levi, a star in the "Shazam" films, has publicly backed Donald Trump's candidacy for the 2024 presidential election, Daily Mail reported.
Zachary Levi, known for his candid political views, made headlines when he announced his endorsement of Donald Trump at 'Team Trump's Reclaim America Tour'. The event, aimed at garnering support for Trump’s 2024 campaign, provided a platform for Levi to express his political shift.
Originally, Levi had shown support for Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s presidential bid earlier in the election cycle. However, following Kennedy's exit from the race, Levi reassessed the political landscape and expressed his newfound support for Trump to his audience.
During his speech, Levi cited a sense of disillusionment with the current political situation as a key reason for his endorsement. He suggested that though his ideal candidate was no longer in the running, Trump represented a feasible alternative capable of addressing the nation's challenges.
"This year, I found Bobby Kennedy, and I thought, man this guy, this guy's it," Levi stated, reflecting on his initial preference in the presidential race. He later added, "And in a perfect world, whatever that would look like, perhaps I would have voted for Bobby, but we don't live in a perfect world. We live in a very broken one."
The actor explained his pivot to Trump by stressing the limited choices left in the race and reiterated his belief in needing a strong leader to correct the country's course. Levi's endorsement, marked by the invocation of Trump’s slogan, "We are going to make America great again," resonated with the audience, inciting applause and cheers.
Interestingly, Zachary Levi was not always a supporter of Donald Trump. Back in 2020, Levi had openly criticized Trump, describing him as "vulgar, callous, narcissistic, and lacking empathy." Despite his past criticisms, Levi now sees Trump as a necessary figure in the current political climate.
"I am no fan or supporter of Trump, and I find his behavior to be vulgar, callous, narcissistic, and lacking empathy," Levi recounted from his past comments. However, he acknowledged that many Conservative supporters felt that Trump was the only candidate who addressed their concerns seriously, which has influenced his current stance.
Levi emphasized his alignment with figures like Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr., praising their qualities which he finds resonate with Trump's approach to leadership. His endorsement reflects a broader tendency among celebrities like Hulk Hogan, Kid Rock, and Elon Musk, who have also shown support for Trump in various capacities.
Beyond politics, Levi's outspoken nature has previously stirred controversies in other areas including his criticisms of the COVID-19 vaccines and the SAG-AFTRA strike. His political and professional disputes have culminated in a public falling out with actor Dwayne Johnson, whom Levi blames for impacting the box office performance of “Shazam” negatively.
Levi also disclosed that Johnson had a hand in vetoing his cameo in the movie “Black Adam,” a spin-off from the Shazam series. These revelations highlight the intertwined nature of personal and professional grievances within Hollywood’s glittering facade.
Levi's endorsement has sparked mixed reactions across the entertainment industry and among fans. As the 2024 election approaches, his political alignment will be watched closely, particularly how it might influence his career and relationships within the industry.
The Bronx Zoo's famous elephant, Happy, has recently been missing from public view, sparking concerns over her wellness.
Speculation around the well-being of Happy the Elephant has escalated due to her prolonged absence from public viewing areas since July, Daily Mail reported.
Happy, an Asian elephant, has been a notable feature at the Bronx Zoo since she arrived in 1977. Known for her intelligence and unique personality, she has been one of the central attractions for visitors over the decades. Since July, however, Happy has not been observed by zoo guests in her usual outdoor exhibit, raising questions about her current condition and care.
Zoo representatives, including spokesperson Mary Dixon and Zoo director Jim Breheny, have consistently reassured the public that Happy is in good health. They suggest that she has been choosing to remain behind the scenes voluntarily. Dixon mentioned that although Happy has been absent during regular hours, she still makes appearances before the zoo opens to the public.
Breheny supported this claim by sharing a video on social media dated September 12, showing Happy in her exhibit's outdoor area. This was intended as proof that Happy remains active and healthy despite public concerns.
Nevertheless, the zoo's reassurances have not quelled public speculation. Critics and animal rights activists question the authenticity of these videos and argue that Happy's absence might indicate deeper health issues, either mental or physical. Courtney Fern, representing the Nonhuman Rights Project, suggests that Happy's solitude and lack of public appearances could be signs of depression or physical discomfort.
Fern articulated concerns that Happy might be suffering too much to enjoy being outside, a distressing possibility if true. These claims gain a bit of traction considering that Happy has been housed alone since her companion died in 2006, further emphasizing the lack of social interaction which is crucial for elephants, known for their need for robust social networks and vast spaces to thrive.
The Bronx Zoo countered these arguments by citing an inspection done by the U.S. Department of Agriculture on August 8, which confirmed that the zoo meets the required standards for elephant care. Despite this, debates over Happy's living conditions persist, fueled by previous legal challenges regarding her captivity.
In recent years, significant legal battles have centered on Happy, focusing on animal rights and ethical treatment, including a notable habeas corpus case that concluded in 2022. These legal proceedings have questioned her conditions of captivity, arguing for more thoughtful consideration of her complex cognitive and emotional capacities.
Caitlin O’Connell, a well-known elephant behavior expert, stresses the importance of considering the natural habits of elephants when managing their care. She points out that elephants are inherently migratory and social creatures who require appropriate physical and psychological accommodations to remain healthy.
Former zoo association president Dan Ashe has commented on the evolution of elephant care, noting advancements in understanding their needs from physical, psychological, and social perspectives.
Despite the definitive statements from the zoo management, the debate around Happy's health and happiness continues to resonate with the public and animal welfare advocates. Videos and inspections aside, the true state of Happy's welfare remains a topic of active discussion and concern among those following her story.
As discussions continue, the Bronx Zoo faces ongoing scrutiny regarding the ethical implications of Happy's living conditions and the broader issues related to the captivity of sentient beings like elephants. The case of Happy reflects wider concerns about animal rights and the responsibilities of human caretakers in zoological settings.
The future may hold further developments in the understanding and standards of care for elephants in captivity, as the public, activists, and legal experts push for more transparent practices and genuinely considerate approaches to animal welfare. The story of Happy serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities involved in wildlife conservation and the ethical management of zoos.