The ongoing dispute between President Donald Trump and Bruce Springsteen took a dramatic turn this week when the president shared a doctored video targeting the iconic rock musician.
According to the Daily Mail, the latest escalation follows a series of personal attacks and political accusations exchanged between the 78-year-old president and the 75-year-old "Born to Run" singer, deepening a public feud that has captured widespread attention online and in the media.
The clash was reignited on May 14 during a Bruce Springsteen concert in Manchester, England, where the singer unleashed sharp criticism against the Trump administration. Onstage, Springsteen referred to Trump as “an unfit president,” and labeled his leadership as “corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous.”
Just days later, at another May 17 concert in the same city, Springsteen doubled down on his political views. He told the crowd that people in his country were being persecuted for exercising their right to dissent and speak freely.
President Trump responded to the criticisms through his social media platform Truth Social on May 20, describing Springsteen in disparaging terms. He called the performer “a dried out prune of a rocker” and “a pushy, obnoxious JERK,” igniting strong reactions from supporters and critics alike.
Trump’s Altered Video Draws Widespread Attention
The tension escalated further a day later on May 21, when Trump posted a digitally altered video mocking Springsteen. The video features Trump taking a golf swing, followed by footage of Springsteen stumbling backward during a performance.
In the edited clip, a computer-generated golf ball appears to hit Springsteen in the back, suggesting that Trump’s imaginary swing caused the fall. The posted video quickly circulated across social media platforms, fueling debate over the ethics of using manipulated content in political discourse.
Although Trump did not publicly comment on the video’s authenticity, its impact was immediate, drawing both support and outrage depending on political affiliation and views of free expression versus online misinformation.
Accusations Broaden to Other Celebrities
Before the video surfaced, Trump had also used Truth Social to accuse a group of celebrities, including Springsteen, of accepting illegal campaign contributions. He published a post around 2 a.m. on May 19, stating that authorities should investigate Springsteen, Beyoncé, Oprah Winfrey, and Bono for purportedly receiving money for supporting Kamala Harris during her 2024 election campaign.
Trump asked in the post how much Kamala Harris had allegedly paid Springsteen for what Trump called a poor campaign performance. He added that similar questions applied to the other celebrities named, though he presented no evidence for any of the claims.
Springsteen has not publicly responded to the accusations regarding campaign finances. However, he has long been a supporter of Democratic candidates and was a vocal advocate for Kamala Harris during her bid for the presidency.
Musicians’ Union Defends Springsteen and Swift
Amid the controversy, the American Federation of Musicians issued a statement defending both Bruce Springsteen and Taylor Swift. In their response, the union called out Trump for singling out members of the musical community in public attacks.
Describing the two artists as “role models and inspirations,” the Federation emphasized their backing for artistic freedom and the rights of all musicians to speak openly. The organization pledged to stand by its members and not allow them to be “personally attacked by the President of the United States.”
Trump had previously aimed at Swift as well, writing on Truth Social that “since I said 'I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT,’ she’s no longer ‘HOT.’” Like with Springsteen, there was no formal provocation leading up to that remark.
Political Tensions Intersect with Pop Culture
The wider conflict between Trump and prominent entertainers points to deeper cultural and political divisions. Springsteen’s overt criticisms and Trump’s retaliatory tone reflect the turbulent state of American politics ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Springsteen remains one of the most high-profile artists to actively criticize Trump, and his recent comments in the UK have renewed discussions about the role of musicians in political dialogue. For his part, Trump continues to lean on social media and divisive rhetoric to target his critics.
As the feud unfolds, issues of media ethics, misinformation, and free speech remain at the forefront. The president’s video post, though possibly intended as satire or mockery, has reignited concerns about the limits of political discourse online.
In an unexpected moment of candor during a tense interview, CNN’s Jake Tapper acknowledged past failings in covering President Joe Biden’s cognitive state.
Tapper, in a May 20 appearance on Megyn Kelly’s SiriusXM show, admitted conservative media had fairly raised concerns about Biden’s mental acuity, which mainstream outlets like CNN had underreported or dismissed, the Daily Mail reported.
The admission came as Tapper promoted his new book, "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again," co-authored with journalist Alex Thompson. The conversation with Kelly quickly shifted from the book to Tapper’s previous reporting decisions, especially about Biden’s mental and physical health.
Kelly pointed to Tapper’s 2022 interview with Biden as a pivotal example. She criticized the interview as too gentle in tone, given mounting evidence at the time of Biden’s decline, including episodes where the president appeared disoriented, slurred his speech, and mistakenly called for a deceased lawmaker during public events.
Tapper conceded that he failed to press the president hard enough and admitted he had underestimated what conservative commentators had already flagged. “Knowing what I know now, obviously I feel tremendous humility about my coverage,” Tapper stated during the broadcast.
Kelly challenges Tapper overthe 2020 exchange
Kelly also resurrected a 2020 clash between Tapper and Lara Trump, in which he had scolded her for raising concerns about Biden's cognitive fitness. Reflecting on that moment, Tapper admitted, “That Lara Trump interview... she saw something that I did not see at the time, 100 percent, and I own that.”
Tapper acknowledged during the interview that he had once asked Biden to release his medical records during the 2020 campaign. “I did ask Joe Biden to be transparent about his health records in an interview in 2020,” he told Kelly. “No, he wasn't transparent at all,” he added, noting that he failed to follow up on that issue in subsequent interviews.
Tapper said the coverage gap extended beyond him and affected the broader media landscape. “There should be a lot of soul-searching… for how this was covered or not covered sufficiently,” he said, as he implicated legacy outlets like CNN and called for more critical reporting going forward.
Book reveals internal Democratic deliberations
In discussing the contents of his book, Tapper explained that he and Thompson had interviewed over 200 Democratic insiders after the 2024 election. According to Tapper, these sources admitted to intentionally playing down Biden’s decline, fearing that a more vocal acknowledgment might help Donald Trump return to office.
“That justified everything in their minds,” said Tapper of Democratic operatives who were reluctant to speak publicly before the election. After Election Day, however, Tapper noted that many were “remarkably willing to talk” about the president’s condition.
Kelly pressed Tapper on whether his book amounted to a confirmation of what outlets like hers had been saying for years—namely, that the media had downplayed Biden’s fitness for office. He agreed that “conservative media has every right to say, ‘We were hip to this and the legacy media was not.’”
The fallout from the Hunter Biden developments
Tapper also offered insight into how personal strain may have affected President Biden’s state. He pointed to the 2023 collapse of a plea deal involving Hunter Biden on gun-related charges as a key turning point for the president’s mental well-being.
While details of Hunter Biden’s legal troubles had long been public, Tapper suggested that the emotional weight of the failed plea agreement had further drained Biden’s capacity to function effectively as commander-in-chief. The timeline connects Biden’s decline, described in the book as becoming more visible in 2023, with both political and personal stressors.
The conversation came just days after Biden publicly revealed a recent prostate cancer diagnosis. While this disclosure was not directly addressed by Tapper during the interview, it adds another layer to ongoing questions about his fitness heading into the next election cycle.
Debate performance triggered party concern
Tapper, who moderated a presidential debate between Biden and Trump, also addressed the widespread fallout that followed Biden’s performance. He described the debate as “disastrous” in the context of the book, noting that the event prompted a wave of Democratic discontent with the president.
The debate performance reportedly intensified internal calls among leading Democrats for Biden to reconsider his reelection plans. For Tapper, it was a moment that confirmed what conservative outlets had long reported—and what much of mainstream media had been slower to explore fully.
Reflecting on his handling of previous interviews, Tapper said, “I wish I could do it differently.” He emphasized that while he had asked Biden questions about age and health at various points, he now believes he should have pursued the matter more doggedly.
“It’s a tough and fair question,” he remarked when Kelly suggested he had turned a blind eye to Biden’s condition. As the conversation wound down, Tapper reiterated his view that both he and the entire establishment media needed to take a closer look at how they handled one of the most significant political narratives of recent years.
Lee Sansum, a respected former royal bodyguard once known by the nickname "Rambo," has died of a heart attack at the age of 63.
Praising his service to Princess Diana and her sons as well as his later advocacy for PTSD awareness, tributes have poured in following his death early Saturday at home, the Mirror reported.
Sansum, who began his career in the Royal Military Police, became globally recognized for his role as a bodyguard to the late Princess Diana and her sons, Princes William and Harry. He gained widespread admiration while protecting the royal family during their vacation in St. Tropez in July 1997, just weeks before Diana’s fatal car accident in Paris. Diana affectionately referred to him as "Rambo" for his disciplined, action-oriented demeanor.
In a letter from that summer, Diana thanked Sansum for helping make "magical ten days" possible during the St. Tropez holiday. The two had built a close friendship, and Sansum once revealed that she cried on his shoulder following the death of her friend, fashion designer Gianni Versace. Sansum often reflected on their moments together, describing her as a compassionate person who "never said a bad word about anyone."
Bond With Princes William and Harry Remembered
Following Diana’s death, Sansum often recalled the bond he formed with her sons. He taught a young Prince Harry how to drive a jet ski, a memory he fondly shared about their time together. He also remembered telling stories from his military past to Harry, who seemed captivated by the tales. These moments created a connection that endured well beyond his professional duties.
Sansum later shared that he had struggled with post-traumatic stress disorder, even while working as a royal bodyguard. When he left military service, he noted, there were limited mental health resources for veterans. He hoped to reconnect with Prince Harry to raise awareness about PTSD, praising the Duke of Sussex’s work in advocating for veterans and mental health support.
Beyond his royal assignments, Sansum had an extensive career in personal security. He worked as a bodyguard for celebrities such as Sylvester Stallone and Tom Cruise. He held black belts in karate, jujitsu, and kickboxing, which added to his reputation as both skilled and formidable in his field.
His Work Spanned Military and Celebrity Detail
Before his royal duties, Sansum had served in Northern Ireland during The Troubles as a member of the Royal Military Police. After he left military service, someone introduced him to business mogul Mohamed Al-Fayed, who became both his employer and a close personal supporter.
It was under Al-Fayed’s direction that he protected Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed during that pivotal summer in 1997.
In later years, Sansum continued working in high-stakes environments. He assisted with evacuating European peacekeepers in Libya on behalf of the European Union. Speaking about that period, he recalled the daily dangers from unexploded ordnance left behind after the conflict, describing the region as dangerous around the clock.
His wife later urged him to seek safer work following close calls overseas. That suggestion led to his participation in Scotland’s 2014 independence referendum as part of the security team for Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond. He described the political climate in Scotland as calm by comparison, saying he would rather dodge eggs than bullets.
Family and Legacy Remembered
Sansum was a father of six and devoted much of his life to protecting others, both through professional service and public advocacy. In 2018, he went public with his experiences battling PTSD. His openness helped raise awareness about mental health in professions where such discussions were once rare.
His passing was announced by his wife, Kate Sansum, who shared an emotional tribute describing him as her "soul mate" and "hero." She said his presence touched lives worldwide and that his memory would always remain with those who knew and loved him.
In a heartfelt statement, Kate revealed, “Since meeting in 1998, Lee Sansum has been the most amazing man in my world. I’m devastated to share that he is no longer with us.” She confirmed that he died from a heart attack early Saturday morning at their home.
A Quiet Farewell for a Public Guardian
She added that while her household grieved deeply, the legacy Sansum left behind — of love, courage and life skills — would endure. “He’s forever loved and will always be with us,” she said. “I love you more than ever, ‘MyLovely Lee.’”
Sansum's unique career bridged the military, celebrity, and royal security worlds. He was one of the last people to have a personal working connection to Princess Diana in her final weeks and continued to reflect on the tragedy throughout his life. He often remarked that Diana might have survived the crash if he had been on duty that night in Paris.
The man once called "Rambo" passed away quietly but leaves behind a legacy defined by protection, honor, and heartfelt care for those he served. His death marks the end of a powerful chapter in royal and military history.
In a striking display of pomp, symbolism, and Catholic tradition, several European royals dressed in white met with the newly inaugurated Pope Leo XIV in Vatican City.On May 18, 2025, Pope Leo XIV was officially installed during a grand Mass in St. Peter’s Square, where he greeted tens of thousands before receiving select Catholic royals, who wore white under a rare papal privilege, Daily Mail reported.
Born Robert Francis Prevost in Chicago, Pope Leo XIV made history earlier this month by becoming the first pontiff from the United States. His election followed a 24-hour conclave held on May 8, when 133 cardinals from 70 countries convened in the Sistine Chapel.
His first official event as pope—the inauguration Mass—took place in St. Peter’s Square under clear skies and tight security. Attendees included heads of state, religious delegates, and members of royal families from around the world.
Among those present were Princess Charlene of Monaco, Queen Letizia of Spain, and Queen Mathilde of Belgium, each dressed in traditional white. Their attire signaled their participation in “le privilège du blanc,” a Vatican-sanctioned honor allowing certain Catholic royal women to wear white when meeting the pope.
Le privilège du blanc sets select royals apart
The dress code for most women at papal audiences typically requires a long black dress with a high neckline, long sleeves, and a black veil—known as a mantilla. The privilege of wearing white is extended to only seven women globally, all of them Catholic queens or princesses.
Princess Charlene attended the Mass with her husband, Prince Albert II. Queen Letizia appeared alongside King Felipe VI of Spain, and Queen Mathilde was accompanied by King Philippe of Belgium. Their coordinated presence underscored the significance of the occasion.
Other dignitaries present at the Mass included Prince Edward, Duke of Edinburgh; U.S. Vice President JD Vance; Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney; German Chancellor Friedrich Merz; Italian President Sergio Mattarella and his wife, Laura; French Prime Minister François Bayrou; and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Pope calls for unity and reconciliation
Following the ceremony, Pope Leo XIV met with attendees before entering St. Peter’s Basilica to pray at the tomb of Saint Peter. In his homily, he called for unity within the Catholic Church and stressed reconciliation around the world.
“I would like our first great desire to be for a united church, a sign of unity and communion,” the pontiff said during his address. He added that the Church should act as a catalyst for peace and healing across communities and nations.
He went on to criticize global divisions and economic injustice, stating, “We still see too much discord, too many wounds caused by hatred, violence, prejudice, the fear of difference, and an economic paradigm that exploits the Earth's resources and marginalizes the poorest.”
First American pope outlines leadership vision
Pope Leo XIV also paid tribute to two of his predecessors—Pope Francis and Pope Leo XIII—as he framed his papacy within a message of social justice and inclusive love. He emphasized that the heart of the Church’s message is a sense of global kinship.
“The heart of the gospel is the love of God that makes us brothers and sisters,” he said. “If this criterion were to prevail in the world, would not every conflict cease and peace return?”
Before the start of the Mass, the pope traversed the square in the popemobile, blessing onlookers from a distance. Unlike some predecessors, he did not pause to greet children individually, citing security considerations as officials controlled the vast crowd.
Celebration follows milestone for Monaco royal twins
The Vatican event took place just days after a major spiritual moment for the princely twins of Monaco. Specifically, Prince Jacques and Princess Gabriella, aged ten, recently celebrated their First Holy Communion, with proud parents Princess Charlene and Prince Albert present.
Following the ceremony, the royal palace of Monaco shared official portraits of the children dressed in ceremonial white robes with golden accents. Additionally, on Instagram, the palace offered warm congratulations, noting the children received the sacrament “with faith and reverence.”
Together, the images of the children’s celebration and Princess Charlene's white ensemble at the Vatican highlighted the religious importance and Catholic traditions embraced by Monaco’s royal family.
Papal era begins with tradition and diplomacy
The inauguration of Pope Leo XIV marks a momentous beginning for the Catholic Church, as it welcomes its first American pope amid global challenges. The presence of royalty and dignitaries served as both a ceremonial and symbolic endorsement of his new leadership.
His emphasis on peace-building, environmental stewardship, and compassion for the marginalized signals a continuation of key themes from his predecessors, paired with his vision for a more united global church community.
With his roots in American Catholicism and global experience as a bishop and cardinal, Pope Leo XIV enters his papacy ready to navigate a diverse and divided world while appealing for spiritual cohesion and moral responsibility.
A powerful blast shook a quiet Saturday morning in Palm Springs, leaving one person dead and four others injured outside a local fertility clinic.
According to the New York Post, Authorities say a bomb detonated around 11 a.m. outside American Reproductive Centers, causing widespread damage and prompting a terrorism investigation.
The explosion occurred just outside the American Reproductive Centers facility, located directly across from Desert Regional Hospital. The blast is believed to have originated from a parked vehicle, though the precise source remains under investigation. The blast obliterated the clinic entrance and scattered debris over several surrounding blocks.
Palm Springs officials confirmed that one individual was killed in the explosion. That person, who authorities described as being near the suspected car at the time of the detonation, may have been the bomber. Investigators stated that this detail has not yet been confirmed through forensics or identification.
Four others were injured in the incident, but as of Saturday evening, officials said their injuries were not life-threatening. No clinic patients were present during the explosion, and all staff on site were reported to be safe, according to Dr. Maher Abdallah, who runs the medical facility.
Investigators Focus on Car Bomb Origins
During a press conference Saturday night, Palm Springs officials, federal law enforcement, and emergency responders addressed the ongoing response to the explosion. Fire Chief Paul Alvarado said damage extended "for blocks," and classified the event as an intentional act of harm against the property. He described that several buildings nearby sustained serious structural damage.
Palm Springs Mayor Ron DeHarte shared that officials suspect the explosion may have involved a vehicle parked outside the clinic. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi indicated that federal personnel—including the FBI and ATF—were present and actively coordinating efforts on the ground with local agencies.
“Violence against a fertility clinic is unforgivable,” Bondi said during the briefing. She emphasized that the federal government was committed to protecting women's health and safety in all forms. Bondi also acknowledged the unique role clinics like American Reproductive Centers play in communities nationwide.
Clinic Services and Possible Terror Motive
American Reproductive Centers specializes in fertility treatments such as in vitro fertilization and egg transfer. It does not provide abortion services, a detail officials noted concerning potential motives for the incident. While the motive remains officially undetermined, authorities continue to characterize the explosion as deliberate and under terrorist investigation.
Palm Springs Chief of Police Andy Mills said, “Terrorism came knocking on the door of Palm Springs. We survived.” He emphasized the community’s resilience and said the city would continue to serve as a symbol of hope.
U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli confirmed that the FBI had opened an investigation to determine whether the bombing was premeditated and politically motivated. He also clarified that, at this time, there was no known threat to other locations or the wider public.
Explosion Sends Shockwaves Through Town
Local business owners and residents felt the force of the explosion across a significant span of the city. Several reported shattered windows and smoke were visible for miles. Witnesses described smelling unusual odors and feeling the shock of the blast from three miles away.
Business owner Claudio Chavez recounted his experience while waiting for a client inside his upholstery shop nearby. “It felt like an explosion,” he said. “It was so loud it felt like it shook my entire core.”
Chavez added that his storefront windows shattered as a result of the blast. “Inside, I just saw pieces of debris fall from the ceiling,” he said. “Outside, I could see glass everywhere.” He described a large amount of smoke billowing behind nearby roads and damage apparent on surrounding buildings.
Authorities Say No Continuing Threat
Authorities moved quickly to secure the area after the blast. Emergency responders including police, firefighters, and bomb squads evacuated nearby businesses and began searching for any additional devices. Residents were urged to avoid the location as investigations continued.
By Saturday evening, officials stated they were not searching for additional suspects and declared there was no longer an active threat to the public. Palm Springs Police Lt. William Hutchinson mentioned during a press briefing that "everything is in question," including the exact nature of the explosive device and any ideological intent behind the act.
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was en route Saturday to assist with forensic analysis and support the joint local and federal investigation. Officials have not yet confirmed whether the explosive was a pipe bomb, though that possibility remains under consideration.
Clinic Remains Closed During Investigation
Dr. Abdallah expressed relief that no patients were present at the time of the explosion. “Thank God today happened to be a day that we have no patients,” he said. He added that none of the embryos stored within the facility were harmed during the incident.
The clinic is expected to remain closed until safety inspections and the investigation are complete. Surrounding buildings are also undergoing structural assessments due to damage caused by the explosion’s shockwave.
Fire crews and public safety officials will maintain a perimeter around the site while cleanup and recovery efforts are ongoing. Investigators have not given a timeline for when the area will reopen to the public.
Carrie Underwood has withdrawn from public view, posting from a secluded Nashville property, after receiving scrutiny for her critiques on the latest season of “American Idol.”
According to the US Sun, the 42-year-old singer and judge faced fan backlash following a pointed critique of contestant Jamal Roberts, prompting calls for her removal from the show’s panel and resulting in her retreat to a rural location.
Underwood, known for her country music success and “American Idol” Season 4 win, joined the judging panel this season. However, tensions rose in recent weeks after she evaluated 27-year-old contestant Jamal Roberts’ rendition of “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough.” Her comments sharply contrasted with the reactions of her fellow judges, Luke Bryan and Lionel Richie, both of whom applauded and stood for the performance.
While Bryan and Richie offered praise, Underwood was critical. She expressed disappointment that Roberts failed to fully connect with the audience through stage presence. “I feel like you missed such an opportunity to move around and entertain,” she said during the live broadcast.
Adding to her critique, Underwood emphasized the importance of complete performance energy as the finale nears. “We are getting close to the end here; it is time to pull out all the stops,” she told Roberts during the show. “Put 100% of yourself into it.”
Viewers Voice Displeasure Over Judging Comments
Fans quickly took to social media to voice concerns over Underwood’s approach. Many expressed frustration at what they perceived as an unfair standard held against Roberts. Some pointed to the inconsistency in expectations across different performers.
“Please be fair and balanced in your feedback,” one viewer commented respectfully online. Another fan expressed confusion, writing, “Everyone gets to stand still, but he has to move around!! Really?” Some of the more direct feedback included remarks like, “She needs to be replaced next year!”
These sentiments reflected a growing dissatisfaction among the show’s audience. The debate over Underwood’s judging demeanor became widespread on “Idol” fan forums and social media platforms just as the competition narrowed to three finalists.
Carrie Posts From Rural Retreat Amid Fallout
Shortly after the finalists were announced—Breanna Nix, Jamal Roberts, and Slater Nalley—Underwood appeared to step away from the spotlight entirely. She posted casual photos on Instagram showing herself in a natural setting, including a goat and a creek.
One post simply included the caption, “Oh hi.” In another, she wrote, “Jake and I played in the creek yesterday. Found all sorts of things.” Jake is the name of one of her family’s goats, which frequently appears in her social media posts.
These posts marked a shift in her typically high-profile activity during “Idol” season, further fueling speculation that she chose to retreat from public attention in response to the criticism she faced.
Reports Reveal Tension Behind the Scenes
Beyond the public controversies, behind-the-scenes reports suggest a more complex dynamic. According to a production insider quoted by The U.S. Sun, Underwood was not the top choice to join the judging panel when Katy Perry stepped down earlier in the season.
“It was not a unanimous decision,” the insider said, explaining that several well-known music artists in both the pop and country genres were considered for the role. Underwood’s selection followed these conversations, but not without debate.
The same report indicated some crew members are concerned about Underwood’s overall effect on the program. Some have reportedly claimed her influence is having a negative impact on the show's long-standing tradition and tone.
Contestants Prepare for the Finale Without Distraction
Meanwhile, the remaining contestants—Nix, Roberts, and Nalley—are preparing for the upcoming season finale. The final round follows two “Disney Night” episodes that narrowed the contestant pool substantially. Two performers were eliminated in a recent episode, solidifying this season’s Top 3.
Despite the controversy surrounding the panel, the competition remains focused on announcing the next “American Idol.” The show has continued on schedule, though fan commentary surrounding Underwood’s remarks remains a major focus on related social channels.
Neither ABC nor Underwood has issued an official statement regarding the criticisms or her recent retreat to Nashville. At the time of this writing, her involvement in the next season of “American Idol” remains unclear.
Looking Ahead as Reactions Continue Online
The situation has sparked ongoing debate amongst fans and reality television viewers. While some continue to defend Underwood’s right to offer honest feedback to contestants, others question whether her style fits the spirit of the competition at such a late stage.
For now, Underwood has chosen to remain conspicuously quiet, favoring nature-themed Instagram posts over addressing the uproar directly. Her future on the show and potential return to the panel will likely depend on network decisions after the season concludes.
As “American Idol” pushes toward crowning a winner, all eyes remain not just on the finalists, but also on how the judging panel, and particularly Underwood, will be reshaped in the seasons to come.
Glen Rogers, a convicted serial killer once connected to a high-profile murder case, was put to death in Florida after offering bizarre final remarks directed at former President Donald Trump.
Rogers, 62, was executed Thursday evening at Florida State Prison, where he delivered cryptic last words and a parting address to Trump before being declared dead at 6:16 p.m. by lethal injection, the US Sun reported.
Authorities convicted Rogers of five murders. Known by nicknames including the “Casanova Killer” and the “Cross Country Killer,” he once claimed to have killed up to 70 people, though he later denied that claim. Authorities say his victims, primarily women, shared common traits—many were petite, red-haired mothers in their 30s whom Rogers met and charmed in various states across the country.
His most notorious conviction involved the 1995 murder of Tina Marie Cribbs, a 34-year-old Florida mother of two, whom Rogers met at a bar before fatally stabbing her in a Tampa motel. Rogers was arrested shortly afterward in Kentucky while driving her stolen car.
Chilling Criminal History Spanning Multiple States
Authorities have confirmed additional victims, including Sandra Gallagher, Linda Price, Andy Lou Jiles Sutton, and Mark Peters. Gallagher, a 33-year-old woman from California, met Rogers in Van Nuys, and someone later found her burned in her vehicle. Price, 34, called Rogers her "dream man" before he stabbed her to death in Mississippi. Sutton, a mother of four from Louisiana, reportedly slept beside Rogers before he murdered her in bed.
Rogers was convicted of killing Mark Peters, a 72-year-old man from Ohio—the only male victim tied to him by a court. Authorities found Peters' body in a family-owned shack in Kentucky after he had briefly lived with Rogers. Although Rogers once claimed responsibility for dozens more murders, investigators have formally connected him to five homicides based on solid evidence.
The 2012 documentary My Brother the Serial Killer sparked public speculation about Rogers by exploring the theory that he may have committed the 1994 killings of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. However, law enforcement officials dismissed those claims.
Dismissed Link To Simpson-Goldman Murders
The Los Angeles Police Department refuted any suggestion that Rogers had a role in the deaths of Simpson and Goldman. A department spokesperson stated, “We know who killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. We have no reason to believe that Mr. Rogers was involved.”
Cancer claimed the life of O.J. Simpson in April 2024 at age 76. A criminal court had acquitted him, but a civil court later found him liable. Despite the occasional resurfacing of alternate theories in the public eye, law enforcement never deviated from its conclusions in the case.
Rogers’ execution followed extensive legal proceedings. His final appeal, filed by his legal team, was denied by the U.S. Supreme Court just one day before his execution. The court rejected the petition without offering any explanation.
Last-Minute Appeal And Legal Rejection
His attorneys had pushed for a sentence of life imprisonment over capital punishment, citing newly enacted laws related to child trafficking and a history of abuse in Rogers’ past. They argued that these factors warranted reconsideration of his sentence, but the attempt failed to sway the courts.
With the rejection of his appeal, Rogers became the fifth person executed in Florida in 2025. Officials have already scheduled another execution—that of Anthony Wainwright—for June 10.
On the day of his execution, Rogers received a final visit from his wife, whom he acknowledged in his last words. Addressing her directly, he extended thanks before turning his attention to a surprising public figure.
Message To Trump In Final Moments
“President Trump, keep making America great. I’m ready to go,” Rogers said, offering an unexpected endorsement during his last statement. He then added, “Shortly, your questions will be answered,” leaving observers puzzled at the meaning behind his final words.
Authorities reported that after receiving the three-drug injection, Rogers remained mostly motionless, opening his mouth briefly but displaying no further movements. A staff member confirmed his death by calling his name and checking his vital signs.
Throughout his criminal history, investigators noted that Rogers targeted victims with whom he built rapport, often using charm to gain their trust before turning violent. This pattern earned him his infamous nickname, referencing his romantic facade.
Victim Profiles Reveal Disturbing Pattern
Prosecutors found that four of the five women he murdered met a distinct pattern. They were petite, red-haired single mothers in their thirties—a disturbing consistency that suggested predatory targeting based on specific attributes.
Despite initial efforts by his defense team to portray Rogers as a symptom of his troubled past and to seek clemency under newly passed legislation, the evidence of his calculated killings ultimately cemented his fate.
Rogers’ death closes a long and grim chapter in American criminal history, one marked by transcontinental violence, sensational media interest, and lingering theories unacknowledged by law enforcement. His cryptic goodbye to a former president adds a final twist to an already chilling legacy.
In a recent marathon session of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, three lawmakers were caught napping. The session, focused on a significant tax reform bill proposed by Donald Trump, ran overnight and stirred considerable online criticism.
A lengthy meeting to debate a significant tax bill saw multiple representatives caught sleeping, leading to a backlash from the public and questions about congressional efficiency, The US Sun reported.
Michigan Democratic Representative Debbie Dingell, aged 71, was one of the lawmakers observed dozing off during the proceedings. The session began at 2 pm on Tuesday and stretched into the early hours of Wednesday morning.
Similarly, Illinois Democratic Representative Jan Schakowsky, aged 80, and Utah Republican Representative Blake Moore, aged 44, were also filmed sleeping. Their actions, caught on video and widely shared on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), brought a wave of criticism.
The Spectator's correspondent captured and posted a video showing Representative Dingell asleep, which quickly ignited reactions online. Critics labelled the incident as disgraceful and cited it as evidence of congressional inefficiency.
Debate Around Tax Bill Heats Up As Lawmakers Nod Off
At the center of this marathon meeting was Trump’s new tax bill. This proposal aims to cut $5 trillion in government spending, including controversial suggestions to abolish certain taxes that affect programs like Medicaid, food assistance, and green energy initiatives.
Democrats strongly opposed these cuts. They argued that such reductions would severely impact vulnerable populations who rely on these services. The discussion on this contentious bill contributed to the exhaustive length of the meeting.
In response to the storm of criticism, Debbie Dingell defended her actions on social media. She explained she had been awake for over 30 hours, combating efforts she believed would undermine vital public services such as Medicaid. "Closed my eyes to think about an America where everyone has access to quality, affordable health care," Dingell posted on X.
Critical Responses and Defenses Arise on Social Media
Responses on X and other social platforms reflected a divide in public opinion. Some users expressed outrage, questioning how lawmakers could sleep through such a critical discussion. A typical comment read, "WTF?! Democrat Rep. Debbie Dingell is ASLEEP in a committee hearing this morning. This is why they never get anything done."
However, within this realm of critique, others defended the representatives, pointing out the unreasonable duration of the debate and the physical demands placed on lawmakers. These defenses highlighted the complexity of legislative processes and the intense pressure placed on these public servants.
Amid the controversy, Debbie Dingell also addressed another serious topic during the meeting. She discussed the severe impact of chronic understaffing in nursing homes—a concern amplified during the Covid pandemic that led to numerous deaths. "Our long-term care system is broken," she argued, shedding light on an often-overlooked crisis affecting elderly and disabled Americans.
Future Implications: Congressional Efficiency in Question
The incident of sleeping lawmakers has sparked a broader discussion about the efficiency of Congress and its methods of operation. This debate surfaces alongside significant legislative proposals that could reshape the federal funding landscape dramatically.
As the fallout from the meeting continues, both the public and politicians are left reflecting on how such incidents reflect on the institution's ability to govern effectively. The sleeping scandal, although seemingly minor, underscores deeper systemic issues that may need addressing to restore public confidence in legislative proceedings.
In the aftermath, all eyes remain on how these representatives will further handle the discourse around the tax bill and other pressing national issues. The balancing act between political responsibilities and the physical limitations of lawmakers continues to be a topic of national scrutiny.
In a move that has captured widespread attention, Lee Zeldin, the director of the Environmental Protection Agency, has proposed to eliminate the auto start/stop feature in vehicles.
Expressing public dissatisfaction, Zeldin argued that this measure was more a gesture than a necessity in achieving environmental standards, Daily Mail reported.
The auto start/stop technology was originally introduced to assist car manufacturers in meeting the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards by the year 2020. This feature automatically shuts off the car's engine when the vehicle stops and restarts it when the accelerator is pressed. It aims to reduce fuel consumption and emissions during idle periods.
However, despite its intentions, the technology has not significantly improved overall air quality. Moreover, many drivers find the feature inconvenient, as it requires manual deactivation every time the vehicle is started. Zeldin's critique of the technology has resonated with many, describing it as a "climate participation trophy."
Public Reacts Enthusiastically on Social Media
The announcement from Zeldin made waves on the social media platform X, where it quickly went viral. Within just 24 hours, his post had amassed eight million views, 11,000 reposts, and 92,000 likes, highlighting the strong public interest and approval of his proposal.
The discussion has extended beyond just social media chatter. Drivers from various political backgrounds have shown bipartisan support for Zeldin’s initiative, underscoring the widespread discontent with the start/stop feature. This technology, standard in vehicles such as the Jeep Grand Cherokee, has been a point of contention among consumers.
Public figures and citizens alike have voiced their concerns. Michael Barone, a prominent author and journalist, noted, "Not only does your car die at every red light, so does your air conditioning." His comment points to the discomfort experienced by drivers, especially in warmer climates such as Florida, where the waiting time at lights can be extensive.
Safety and Economic Concerns Raise Alarm
For many, the issues with start/stop technology extend beyond mere inconvenience. Safety concerns have been a significant part of the conversation. Matt Nachtrab shared a personal experience, stating, "Our Honda would stall and not start, leaving us in vulnerable situations." This hesitation, he noted, occurs even in moments critical for safe driving, like pulling across traffic.
An economic perspective was provided by car salesman Litizen Jeff, who pointed out that the fuel savings are minimal at best. "From personal testing, for most, it doesn’t save much anyway. 900 miles in a month, 0.02 gal saved," he explained. More critically, he highlighted the potential safety risks, such as stalling out briefly while making turns.
Zeldin's announcement not only echoed the sentiments of frustrated drivers but also brought to light the broader implications of the technology. Freda Drake, another driver impacted by the feature, commented, "We had to replace our battery much earlier because of this feature! Increased demand for car batteries isn’t any better for the environment," critiquing the supposed environmental benefits of the technology.
Calls for Policy Changes Gather Momentum
Darren Montgomery's dramatic statement captured the frustration felt by many, particularly in hot climates. "Auto stop-start in a Southern summer is attempted manslaughter by climate control," he exclaimed. This severe discomfort has led many to demand a reevaluation of the policy.
Not surprisingly, the issue has even attracted hyperbolic praise, with one commenter stating, “If Trump gets this done, he belongs on Mount Rushmore,” illustrating the strong sentiments the proposal has invoked among its supporters.
The visceral reactions to Zeldin’s proposed changes underscore a broader debate about technology, environmental policy, and consumer preferences. As the discussion continues, observers await the EPA's response, especially since the agency has not yet issued a comment on the matter.
Future Implications for Auto Industry Regulations
As policymakers weigh their next steps, the auto industry closely monitors their decisions. The removal of the start/stop technology may signal that regulators are shifting how they balance environmental rules with consumer satisfaction and safety considerations.
This debate underscores the need for a nuanced approach to environmental policy—one that values the lived experiences of everyday people while still pushing toward sustainability goals. Moving forward, policymakers and industry leaders must develop solutions that address multiple needs without sacrificing safety or comfort.
Although the public clearly supports Zeldin’s proposal, observers will closely watch the EPA’s next actions, which will set important precedents for future environmental and automotive standards.
Church officials have publicly displayed the incorrupt body of Saint Teresa of Avila for the first time in over a century, highlighting both historical reverence and modern scientific intrigue.
According to the Daily Mail, On May 12, 2025, officials showcased the preserved remains of Saint Teresa of Avila—who died in 1582—at the Basilica of the Annunciation of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, marking a significant event for both the religious and scientific communities.
Saint Teresa of Avila, a prominent figure in the Catholic Church, died 440 years ago. Her death in 1582 marked the beginning of a historical legacy that continues to influence many today. Her life, celebrated for deep spiritual insights and reform within the Carmelite order, has gained her a following that spans centuries.
Marco Chiesa, the General Postulator of the Order, decided to exhume her body. This took place at the Diocese of Avila, Spain, on August 28, under circumstances that maintained the utmost respect and religious protocol. The findings surprised many: observers saw her remarkably well-preserved body, with her face and limbs visible—a state the Church described as "incorrupt."
An Astounding Discovery of Preservation
Father Marco Chiesa shared insights into the condition of Saint Teresa's body. "There is no color, there is no skin color, because the skin is mummified, but it can be seen, especially in the middle of the face. It can be seen well. The expert doctors can see Teresa's face almost clearly,” he explained. This has provided a unique opportunity for both theological reflection and scientific study.
Father Clemente de los Santos, then superior general of the Discalced Carmelites, last opened Saint Teresa's coffin in the year 1914. Therefore, the recent public display not only marked a rare event but also continued a century-old reverence for her life and work. The designers built the coffin as a sophisticated enclosure of silver encased in marble, and authorities highly secure it, requiring ten different keys for access.
On display at the Basilica of the Annunciation of Our Lady of Mount Carmel in Alba de Tormes, Salamanca, the event drew large crowds. Visitors and devotees came to witness what many described as a divine preservation. “Her body is still incorrupt. Look for God’s miracles," relayed the faithful on social media, echoing a sentiment of awe and spiritual profundity.
Scientific Analysis Meets Religious History
The preservation of Saint Teresa's body has sparked considerable interest from the scientific community. A team of researchers is currently analyzing her DNA and other significant aspects to better understand the surrounding conditions and explore possible avenues for the future conservation of such relics.
St. Teresa's historical health afflictions, which included convulsions, stomach issues, dizziness, loss of consciousness, and calcareous spines on her feet, have been the subject of particular interest. Father Marco Chiesa highlighted these afflictions and noted their presence during the examination. "Analysing the foot in Rome, we saw the presence of calcareous thorns that make it almost impossible to walk. But she walked to Alba de Tormes and then died. She desired to continue and move forward, despite the physical defects,” Chiesa elaborated.
These findings provide a new layer of insight into St Teresa’s daily struggles and resilience. They also underscore the interplay between her physical tribulations and her intensely spiritual writings, where she often conveyed an ethos of perseverance through suffering.
Towards a Broader Understanding of Incorruption
The ongoing scientific analysis, conducted in an Italian laboratory, promises to offer more data in the coming months. The potential discoveries could provide groundbreaking insights into the phenomenon of incorruptibility, a subject of fascination and mystery within theological circles.
Father Chiesa echoed a narrative of perseverance and pain from Teresa's final days to Anne of St. Bartholomew, a close companion. "At last, my daughter, I have reached the house of death," were the words recounted, reflecting her enduring spirit even as she faced the end of her mortal journey.
The exhibition has not only revived interest in the life and works of Saint Teresa but has also bridged historical faith narratives with modern scientific inquiry. Her legacy continues to inspire, engaging devotees and academics alike in a dialogue that spans beyond the confines of time and science.
