Ross Coulthart and Danny Sheehan, two key figures in the field, have recently declared that the US Government is actively downing unidentified flying objects using advanced technology.
According to the Irish Star, this activity could be harming extraterrestrial occupants within these objects, stirring significant ethical debates.
Investigative journalist Ross Coulthart has amplified claims that attorney Danny Sheehan initially made regarding the US government’s engagement with alien technology. Sheehan, an experienced counsel in governmental matters, first brought these concerns to light and alleged that a secret technology was developed to incapacitate and capture UFOs.
Sheehan claims that this technology is not only sophisticated but also aggressive, designed specifically to forcibly bring down these crafts. This assertion suggests that the US has been more involved in UFO incidents than official sources have previously admitted.
Sheehan provides further details on the technology by describing its high-power capabilities, which are likely disruptive to the crafts' operations. "They've developed technology to knock these, some of these things down. It's an extraordinarily powerful technology, we'll call it, capable of disabling the craft, forcing them down," Sheehan explained.
Sheehan added gravity to his statements by noting that several UFOs have been brought down and retrieved intact. This suggests that the encounters are not just opportunistic but planned. Such revelations hint at a possibly global scale of technological retrieval and examination of non-human crafts.
Ross Coulthart, speaking on NewsNow, voiced his apprehensions regarding what these aggressive tactics might mean for the beings inside these crafts. "I am told that we, the American public, should be informed, are using high-pulse microwave weapons against non-human craft, and we are bringing those craft down so that we can retrieve them and salvage the technology," he said. In addition, he emphasized the significant impact these actions may have on both the crafts and their occupants.
Meanwhile, while Coulthart shed light on the technological aspect of these interceptions, he also raised important questions about the fate of the aliens themselves. “God knows what we are doing to the alien beings inside those crafts – I hope we treat them with respect. Heaven help us if there is ever a reckoning for the crimes and indeed immoralities we have committed in the name of national security,” Coulthart expressed his concerns.
Coulthart and Sheehan's comments highlight a broader issue of transparency and ethical governance in handling extraterrestrial engagements. These actions could have vast implications, potentially affecting international law and human ethics in ways that have not been previously contemplated.
Despite the groundbreaking nature of their claims, Coulthart admitted that solid evidence to independently verify his and Sheehan's statements remains absent. This lack of concrete proof leaves room for skepticism and raises demands for accountability, pushing for ethically justifiable actions if such activities are occurring.
The discussion about the use of high-stakes technologies opens a Pandora's box regarding the rights of beings from elsewhere and humanity's conduct in potential interspecies interactions. As this story unfolds, the call for transparency in handling UFO phenomena and extraterrestrial life forms grows louder, driven by global curiosity and concern for universal rights and ethics.
Coulthart and Sheehan's concerns suggest the need for a framework to address such extraordinary situations. Therefore, the global community’s reaction, along with any preventative or legislative actions, could set precedents for future encounters with unidentified flying objects and their occupants.
Moreover, the debate over the moral implications of intentionally downing UFOs with advanced technology has only just begun. As technology advances, in turn, the need for robust ethical guidelines to govern these new frontiers will grow.
In the meantime, the global audience and regulatory bodies must wait and observe, hoping that more information will surface and bring clarity to an issue that remains shrouded in mystery and intrigue.